Peer Review Process

PEER REVIEW PROCESS

Peer Review Process of HERU

All manuscripts submitted to HERU: Health Empowerment and Research Universe undergo a structured editorial and peer-review process to ensure scientific quality, originality, ethical compliance, and relevance to the journal's scope.

Review Model: Double-Blind Peer Review  •  Minimum Reviewers: Two Independent Reviewers

Editorial and Review Workflow

01
STEP 01

Manuscript Submission

Authors submit manuscripts through the HERU Online Journal System (OJS). The corresponding author is responsible for ensuring that all required information and supporting documents are complete.

02
STEP 02

Initial Editorial Screening

The editorial team evaluates the manuscript for suitability with the journal's Focus and Scope, manuscript completeness, originality, scientific quality, ethical compliance, and conformity with the Author Guidelines.

03
STEP 03

Similarity and Ethical Screening

Manuscripts may be screened using plagiarism-detection software. The editorial team also reviews potential ethical issues, duplicate publication, conflicts of interest, and research ethics requirements.

04
STEP 04

Reviewer Assignment

Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are assigned to at least two independent reviewers whose expertise is relevant to the subject of the manuscript.

05
STEP 05

Double-Blind Peer Review

HERU applies a double-blind peer-review system. The identities of authors are concealed from reviewers and the identities of reviewers are concealed from authors during the review process.

06
STEP 06

Reviewer Evaluation

Reviewers assess the manuscript based on originality, methodological quality, scientific contribution, validity of results, clarity of presentation, quality of discussion, ethical considerations, and relevance to health sciences.

07
STEP 07

Editorial Decision

Based on the reviewers' recommendations and editorial evaluation, the manuscript may receive one of the following decisions:

AcceptMinor RevisionMajor RevisionResubmit for ReviewReject
08
STEP 08

Author Revision

Authors are required to revise the manuscript carefully and provide a clear response to all reviewer and editor comments. Revised manuscripts may be returned to reviewers when further evaluation is required.

09
STEP 09

Final Editorial Decision

The Editor in Chief or responsible editor makes the final decision based on the scientific quality of the revised manuscript, reviewers' recommendations, and compliance with journal policies.

10
STEP 10

Copyediting, Layout, and Publication

Accepted manuscripts proceed to copyediting, layout, proofreading, metadata verification, and final publication in HERU.

Review Criteria

OriginalityNovelty and contribution to scientific knowledge.
MethodologyAppropriateness and scientific rigor of the research methods.
Scientific QualityAccuracy, validity, and quality of analysis and interpretation.
RelevanceContribution and relevance to health sciences and society.
Ethical ComplianceCompliance with applicable ethical and publication standards.
PresentationClarity, organization, language quality, tables, and figures.